Sunday, November 25, 2012

Life of a Pi [Views]

Directed by : Ang Lee
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0454876/


A writer comes to meet Pi Patel (Irrfan Khan) to get some story from his life that is adventurous and would make him believe in God. And so Pi Patel begins narrating his story from childhood when he lived with his family in Pondicherry.

The first sequence is well done montage of zoo, comprising of almost every animal. The first of many visual delights in the movie.

Earlier part of screenplay deals with how Pi Patel got his nickname Pi, the fun fellow classmates would make at his full name 'Piscine' and how he would try to get through them. The urge to follow every religion, which compels Pi's father telling him that 'If you believe in everything, you will end up not believing in anything at all'.

Adil Hussain as Pi's father and Tabu as his mother are excellent in their performances though Tabu gets very less dialogue scenes, Adil has some of best lines in the movie specially the one where he tells Pi that Richard Parker (the tiger) doesn't care for anything, except his food.

The most engaging part of the film begins when we move to the ship scene, the thunderstorm leading to Pi left alone on a lifeboat which has 'Richard Parker' in it too. Henceforth starts the journey of survival for Pi, not just to find food or escape any further storms but also to make sure Richard Parker gets enough food and doesn't end up eating Pi.

The struggle Pi goes through, firstly to find food, then to manage distance from Richard parker initially until they become friendly to each other, is presented with some great sea visuals. Add to it the scene where both reach a green island full of small gooses (i hope thats what they are called). For me, that whole scene was brilliant, and perhaps best of the movie. Also, the scene where Pi has to eat the food Richard Parker would eat because of no other choice, one wonderful dialogue he speaks there. And that scene where Pi takes Richard Parker on his laps, like a son in mother's laps.

All this should had made me love the film, but that doesn't happen because I felt the main character Pi (Suraj Sharma) was too loud. I was not able to like his performance at all despite having loved all the scenes that involved him. Some other actor would had done better justice to the character.

The Screenplay was pretty good, the climax does get little lengthy specially when Irrfan narrates those 2 stories but that scene had to be longer. Some of the dialogues had great humour in them, specially the Pondicherry part, or the names of both Pi and Parker. And, how real the tiger looks.. some great work by the effects team.

Another great scene in the movie was, when Richard Parker reaches near Jungle, stops and then goes through leaving Pi heartbroken. Also, the one where Irrfan (Elder Pi) tells the writer about the 2 different stories he told the cops, one was point of view of Pi and other was point of view of Richard Parker.

Irrfan Khan was much better than 'The Amazing Spiderman' in terms of accent, still wonder what the need is for him to have such accent.


In the end, Life of a Pi turned to be a Decent movie for me at the most mainly for the Pi-Parker boat sequences, direction and writing (though its adapted from a book). Visually there are many scenes to admire. Wish the leading actor for younger Pi was impressive too.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Drive [Views]

Directed by : Nicolas Winding Refn
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780504/


A guy who is brilliant at his driving skills, that he uses it in different ways to get a earning. Be it helping robbers to run away, or a movie stunt, or a race.

The screenplay is kept very slow, and it works. Ryan Gosling's long 'no blink' scenes, and the kind of low life he lives, not interested in anyone else except his driving. And when he meets Irene (Carey Mulligan), a married girl.. he instantly gets a liking for her. Also, few of the scenes where he shows more emotions, his anger against the girl who was involved in a plan against him, or when his own friend makes a big blunder.

There is a unique similarity between 'Taxi Driver' and this film. Probably, the lovers of Taxi Driver won't like this comment made by me. But, I feel the character of Ryan Gosling, also was shown in a very similar fashion.. only  and big difference was that Ryan wasn't too insane and involved in everyone's life in his area.

That scene where he puts a mask, knowing he has got only one option left to survive alive. I would say the pre-climax scene slightly dissappointed me, maybe because I excepted a thrilling sequence instead of a simple one.

The starting of the movie is spectacular, the car chase in a different way. Also, the scene where the plans go wrong for Ryan.

Cinematography was brilliant. Also, the film is rich in emotional content. Note the scene where Ryan keeps looking into the eyes of Irene, asks her if she wanna come with him on weekend, she doesn't reply and he keeps looking, passes a small smile, again keeps looking and the scene ends. Less dialogues, and long scenes added a lot to the characters and the narration.

The songs are perfectly used in the movie, specially the opening credits one, and the one where Ryan starts getting more involved with Irene and her kid.

Albert Brooks and Bryan Cranston were efficient in their supporting roles too.

Overall, Drive is a must-watch film for its narration, and quite a good Ryan Gosling performance. Maybe you won't love it, but you certainly not gonna dislike it. And yea, this film isn't for the popcorn or entertainment seeking audience, please stay away from the film.

Friday, November 9, 2012

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo [Views]

Directed by : Niels Arden Oplev (Sweden version)


Directed by : David Fincher (American version)


The film is based on some famous novel, thriller based. Its of three parts, and all of them have been made into swedish movies. While American one has only first one done till now, and rest two are expected by 2014. 

I liked both the versions, both have positives and own flaws. But, if I have to choose one, then I would prefer Sweden one, mainly because the girl playing main lead made more impact in the sweden version, and also the writing was more in favour of her in the sweden version, while the american foccussed more on her trauma, and very less on the relation she shares with the journalist. 

Journalist Mikael Blomkvist gets a investigating case from powerful Wanger Family of a girl Harriet who is missing since 40 years, but whose killer is still alive. Mikael who is already seen himself in wrong light by the media for his reporting against one of famous personalities who actually sets Mikael up. To get a good change, Mikael accepts the case and slowly gets totally intrigued into the case but he requires help of Lisabeth, a brilliant computer hacker to solve the case. Both get together, and start solving the case that lays doubts on each and every member of the Wanger Family. 

Sweden Version : Though Michael Nyqvist acted the part of Mikael very well, he looked old to play the character, specially the scenes between him and Lisabeth looked less appealing. I like the way Lisabeth character is written, the personal problems she face and the way she looks at guys not having any trust in them. The whole guardian-Lisabeth sequences were very captivating. And the way Lisabeth comes into the investigation of Harriet, and her help, and the question she asks herself if Michael is a guy she can trust or not. 

Another highlight of this version, is the back-story of Lisabeth done in a min or two scene telling why she has become like this now. What incident made her like this. 

I think in a way the writing made Mikael less effective in the investigation case, though he started it very well, but its Lisabeth who took him to the conclusion. Also, I liked the ending very much, specially the final shot. 

Noomi Rapace was brilliant in her portrayal of Lisabeth character. Though, it took a while to accept her looks, being treated not well mentally that kinda look given to her. She easily brought the vulnerability and uneasyness while talking to guys, plus the way she would help Mikael. 

The Bible numbers and names mystery was very well put, and the way it gets solved. I like the detailing done to this part. 

Also, the conversation the killer has in the final portions of the movie, the dialogues of that part made the killer look more deadly. 


American Version : Lisabeth-guardian sequences are almost similar, with extra footage of expired guardian to give a feel what Lisabeth is about to face. In this version, Mikael is much stronger in his abilities to solve case, though Lisabeth does come into his investigation to help him out but Mikael himself succeeds much more in this version. The Mikael-Lisabeth sex scenes though aren't directed well, as they are (though very few) in the sweden version. 

While the climax is changed here, be it Harriet mystery or the Mikael earlier case which Lisabeth tries to help him out of. The change in Harriet is useless, could had gone with same one. But, Lisabeth is good because it kinda of establishes how she gonna on her own manage out in next parts. 

Daniel Craig, was very good in his performance, while Rooney Mara was let down by the writing, except for few scenes, she couldn't make me love her. The lesbian scene which is edited in sweden version, was very nicely done by director in this version. 


Overall, the reason the film works in both versions is the screenplay, the mystery keeps getting revealed slowly and the Lisabeth character makes is exciting. Which version you would like would most probably depend on which Lisabeth and Mikael you liked. 

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Movie Analysis : Rush

Directed  by : Shamin Desai
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2256514/


A struggling guy Sam (Emraan Hashmi) who has a girlfriend Ahana (Sagarika Ghatge) he wants to marry, but needs to get a high salary job. He gets a offer from Lisa (Neha Dhupia) to work for Crime 24 channel as main Editor. Sam takes Ahana with her to foreign place for this new job. He gets a big flat and car, just the kind of lifestyle he would had wanted to have. But, little does he know.. that he has been set up in a trap that he will not find easy to escape.

The story sounds so similar to Blood Money, just replace the job from 'Diamond company' to 'News reporting'. Only difference is, Blood Money didn't waste any time and started right away from the main plot.. while in Rush, the narration goes slowly towards the main aspect of the film, almost takes up full first half.

Dialogues are average.The songs are completely forced into the narrative, especially 'Mumkin nahin'. Whosoever idea it was, seriously has no music sense. Fukra is the only song to some extent that goes in flow with the narrative.

Emraan Hashmi is very good in the scenes where he is shown anchoring his own show for news channel, apart from that there's nothing new or appealing to talk about his performance.

Sagarika Ghatge was impressive in 'Chak De India', but in this film her acting fails terribly. Most of the part it she appeared having no interest in the scenes of the movie.

Aditya Pancholi, who plays the main villian i.e Boss of Crime 24.. couldn't bring that extra to the movie mainly due to the screenplay that never allows him enough screen space to make any impact.

Rahul Singh hams like hell 'You are dead, you are dead'.

Neha Dhupia was the best among all the actors, looked confident, and completely fitted into the character. Plus, she looked so glamarous too.


Overall, Rush had a good concept but extremly poor execution..


Verdict : BELOW AVERAGE

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Movie Analysis : Ajab Ghazab Love

Directed by : Sanjay Gadhvi
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2356959/


Rajveer (Jackky Bhagnani), a rich guy,  falls in love at first sight with a rich girl Madhuri (Nidhi Subbaiah) who hates rich people. Rajveer introduces himself as a poor guy, with background of poor family making his whole family to enact all the lies he builds. How long Rajveer would succeed, especially with Madhuri's twin Brothers Karan and Arjun (Arjun Rampal), who hates people lying and cheating...

The film suffers heavily for trying to bring comedy leaving some scenes make no sense. Take for eg, Rajveer telling Arjun, the lie of his father's rich friend, Subbo (Arshad Warsi) having a accident and his father donating kidney khade khade.. how fake that lie looks. Then, the dose of over-dramatic scenes, one where Madhuri feels apologetic to the family of Rajveer, or one where Rajveer realises how good his father has been, or the one where Rajveer's father feels for the poor people. These scenes change the tone of the film, plus average background score doesn't help either.

Dialogue writing is very poor, save for few of the good comedy punches. The dream song looks very odd in terms of picturisation.

'Tu' was my favourite song in the movie, very romantic and well filmed too. Also, 'Sun Soniye' was quite good too.

The 'banana' sequence, first meeting of Madhuri with Rajveer's parents, and Madhuri's brother Arjun going to live at place of Subbo acting as the head of the house were some of the best moments in the film. Also, Arjun Rampal's 'samajh gaye ? Toh phir sar hilaayo'.

Jackky Bhagnani is very good in his performance yet again. Nidhi Subbaiah is average, over-acts at many places. Arjun Rampal entertains in supporting role of twin brothers. Kirron Kher is funny as always, though she went over-the top in the first blind scene she does. Darshan Jariwala is impressive. Amarjeet Singh is decent.


Overall, Ajab Ghazab Love gives you some good laughs, but like many movies in past.. drama and comedy don't gel together properly.


Verdict  : AVERAGE

Friday, October 26, 2012

Taken 2 [Views]

Directed by : Olivier Megaton
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1397280/

If I kill you, your other sons will  come and seek revenge ? 'They will'. And I will kill them too.


There are films that are so much performance oriented, that even if its weak in rest departments, it matters very less as the movie has made a impact on you. Taken2 falls in that category for me, for the performance of Liam Neeson. I loved his performance, mind you that doesn't mean I am saying its a oscar worthy.

I haven't seen the 1st part yet, so I assume the starting 5-10 mins where Murad (Rade Serbedzija) pledges to take revenge of his son, must had been killed in last part. Retired CIA, Bryan (Liam Neeson) asks his ex-wife Lenore (Famke Janssen) and daughter, Kim (Maggie Grace) to come to Istanbul and spend some time with him, which would be a pleasant change for them too. But, he isn't aware that Murad is planning revenge not only against him but his wife and daughter too. Bryan and Lenore gets taken by Murad, but Kim escapes. Bryan insists her to go to embassy and be safe, but she has other plans as she wants to help her father and mom.

The love track between Bryan and Lenore doesn't work to me, again I am taking a guess that in part1 there would be scenes that describe how their relation failed. Maggie Grace over-acts a lot. While Rade Serbedzija never interests me, as normally the villian should be much more powerful but he never appeared to be so. The ending very much justifies that statement.

Liam Neeson is beyond brilliant, the way he uses memory when his eyes are closed to remember places on basis of voices he hears and the time it takes to reach a particular place (Reminded me of a hindi film qatl). And then later, he uses that same memory to relocate to the place where Murad is hiding. He's always one step ahead of his enemies, and the only time he misses is when his wife makes a mistake.

The action sequences are very good, they had the 'bourne series' feel, not just for the action but also the background score. Dialogues are good, especially Liam one's.


Taken2 is likeable only due to Liam Neeson, single handedly he carries the film from the start till the end.

Argo [Views]

Directed by : Ben Affleck
Imdb link -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1024648/

The whole country is watching you ... they just don't know it. 


The movie begins with a small history about U.S, and Iran.. and the developments taking place in those countries. Its a quick 5 minute voiceover (pretty much like Piyush Mishra opening credits description in GOW1). And the 1st shot that comes after that, is a very large amount of people gathered outside the U.S Embassy in the Iran, to protest against a leader named 'Shah' being taken in the embassy, and not killed yet. There was hatred among the people for Shah, and they broke into the embassy leaving the people present inside the embassy in total panic. Just 6 americans inside the embassy managed to escape, rest all were taken hostage. The 6 americans were kept hidden by a canadian ambassador, which was known only by a US CIA spy agency.

CIA's exfil, Tony (Ben Affleck) expert puts forward a plan of acting like a film production person, he would make a fake canadian movie that requires a certain location in Iran to be visited, and the 6 americans would be the crew of the movie, who would flew back with Tony. The problem for Tony is, not only he has less time to promote a fake movie that looks real, his own CIA people aren't pleased with the movie idea, and may anytime change the plan.

The film is based on a true story, its a history based film.. yet its full of humurous moments thanks to the part where Tony goes to meet the Hollywood people, Lester (Alan Arkin) and John (John Goodman) to help him in the fake movie idea. Both Lester and John were amazing to the extent that in what was a very serious movie, their scenes would almost always bring a laugh or two. Lester's 'Argo fuck yourself' was hillarious. And the dialogues written were funny too, 'This is the best bad idea we have Sir, by far'.

All the 6 actors playing the american characters, portrayed the dread and scared look pretty well. Kathy (Kerry Bishe), acts like a professional movie crew member, by taking the photos of the Iran market location where Tony takes all of them, only to get into unexpected kind of trouble. Cora (Clea Duvall) polite query to Tony 'Can we rehearse once again' when Tony is feeling 'all lost', and Tony telling her 'You did quite well, Cora.. have some rest now'.

Joe (Scoot Mcnairy) has two scenes of his own, one where he expresses how he has made Kathy suffer in all this revolution, but the main one where he surprises not just Tony but the audience is at the airport.

Ben Affleck brings a calmness to the character of Tony, even when there appears to be some problems in his married life which ain't given any importance understandably as per demand of the subject. The dejection on the face of Ben when he feels all preparations went waste, the surprised look when he sees the confidence in Joe to help everyone, the happy look to see Cora trying and practising so hard, and the slightest of smile he gives during one of the key scene in the movie. The reason why its easy to connect to his character is, that he keeps it simple.. never tries to be over-smart, always shows the fear that is always there in him at every checkpoints of airport, or while he is in Iran.

The airport climax sequence is without a doubt nerve wrecking, you won't be able to move out of your seat, and you wont either be able to make a guess as to whether Tony would succeed or fail, as both have equal probabilities. Special mention to the fast editing done in that sequence, that builds the tension much more.

Also, I liked the fact that the rehearsals sequence are shown very less, as the fear of the 6 americans and how much vulnerable they would be, was required to be exploited.

Excellent direction, writing and screenplay (though its very much linear), there are some cliches done in the narrative but all that just adds to the drama of the movie. Special mention to the light background score at the final shot of the movie, love when films end that way.. it increases the liking.


Argo is among the best Hollywood movies that have come out this year, probably I loved it as much as I loved The Dark Knight Rises. I have a feeling, Argo is gonna get nominations in Oscar awards. Yup.